Gerakan Tajdīd Berdasarkan Sumber Hukum Islam, Akal, dan Wahyu Perspektif Muhammad Abduh
Keywords:
Tajdīd, Reason and Revelation, Muhammad AbduhAbstract
This article aims to examine the concept and characteristics of the tajdīd (renewal) movement in Islam based on the sources of Islamic law reason and revelation from the perspective of Muhammad Abduh. The study focuses on how Abduh positions the relationship between human rationality and the authority of revealed texts in responding to the stagnation of Islamic thought and the challenges of modernity. This research employs a qualitative approach with a library research design. The data are derived from Muhammad Abduh’s principal works, such as Risālah al-Tauḥīd and Tafsīr al-Manār (co-authored with Rashid Rida), as well as secondary sources in the form of relevant books and scholarly journal articles. Data collection was conducted through documentation techniques, while data analysis utilized descriptive-analytical and historical-critical approaches. The findings indicate that Muhammad Abduh’s tajdīd movement is grounded in efforts to harmonize reason and revelation, rejecting blind taqlīd and advocating for contextual ijtihad Reason is regarded as an essential instrument for understanding revelation substantively, without undermining the authority of the Qur’an and the Sunnah. Abduh asserts that the decline of the Muslim community stems from intellectual stagnation, the misuse of tradition, and the separation of religion from rational inquiry. Accordingly, tajdīd is directed toward reforming religious thought, education, and social life in order to restore Islam as a rational, dynamic, and timeless religion. In conclusion, this study affirms that tajdīd, according to Muhammad Abduh, constitutes an intellectual and social project that positions reason and revelation in a complementary relationship. This concept remains relevant as a foundation for the renewal of Islamic law and thought in the modern era without compromising the fundamental principles of Islam.
References
Abu-Rabiʿ, I. M. (2004). The Intellectual Origins of Islamic Resurgence in the Modern Arab World. Islamic Studies, 43(3), 345–370.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1993). Islam and Secularism Revisited. Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(2), 161–174.
An-Na‘im, A. A. (2008). Islam and Human Rights: Beyond the Universality Debate. American Journal of International Law, 94(4), 720–730.
Azra, A. (2005). Islamic Reformism in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Survey. Studia Islamika, 12(3), 1–25.
Baderin, M. A. (2010). Islam, Law and Development. Journal of Law and Religion, 26(2), 377–410.
Bakar, O. (2008). The Qur’an on Reason and Rationality. Islam & Science, 6(1), 1–20.
Bano, M. (2010). Ijtihad and Islamic Legal Reform. Modern Asian Studies, 44(3), 573–602.
Bowen, J. R. (2012). Shari‘a, State, and Social Norms. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 359–376.
El Fadl, K. A. (2004). The Centrality of Ethical Values to Islamic Legal Reasoning. UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, 4(1), 1–27.
Esposito, J. L. (2011). Rethinking Islamic Reform. Religion Compass, 5(8), 345–356.
Hallaq, W. B. (1997). Was the Gate of Ijtihad Closed? International Journal of Middle East Studies, 16(1), 3–41.
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Shari‘a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Islamic Law and Society, 16(3), 370–395.
Hefner, R. W. (2011). Civil Islam Revisited. Contemporary Islam, 5(1), 1–18.
Hourani, A. (1983). The Islamic Reformism of Muhammad Abduh. Middle Eastern Studies, 19(3), 289–301.
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Ijtihad and Renewal in Islamic Law. Islamic Studies, 42(2), 171–196.
Knysh, A. (2017). Reform or Renewal? Rethinking Tajdīd. Die Welt des Islams, 57(1), 1–29.
Kurzman, C. (2002). Liberal Islam: Prospects and Challenges. Middle East Review of International Affairs, 6(3), 1–15.
Masud, M. K. (2001). Ijtihad and the Muslim modernists. Islamic Studies, 40(1), 1–25.
Nasr, S. H. (2010). Islam, Reason and Modernity. Islam & Science, 8(2), 101–118.
Opwis, F. (2010). Islamic Law and Legal Change. Islamic Law and Society, 17(2), 247–285.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity. Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 1–20.
Rippin, A. (2004). Rationality and Interpretation in Islamic Thought. Religion, 34(3), 225–239.
Saeed, A. (2006). Ijtihad and Interpretation in Contemporary Islam. Islamic Studies, 45(1), 1–22.
Saifuddin, L. H. (2019). Tajdīd dan Rasionalitas Hukum Islam. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 19(2), 235–260.
Shaharuddin, M. (2016). Reason and Revelation in Islamic Epistemology. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 6(2), 45–63.
Soroush, A. K. (2000). Reason, freedom, and Democracy in Islam. Journal of Democracy, 11(4), 124–138.
Syarif, D. (2020). Reformasi Hukum Islam dan Tantangan Modernitas. Al-Jami‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 58(1), 1–28.
Tibi, B. (2009). Islam and the Challenge of Modernity. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 10(2), 151–170.
Voll, J. O. (2008). Islamic Renewal and Reform. Journal of Islamic Studies, 19(1), 1–20.
Weiss, B. G. (2002). Interpretation in Islamic Law. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 122(1), 1–15.
Zaman, M. Q. (2006). The ulama, Tradition and Modernity. Modern Asian Studies, 40(3), 1–29.
Zarkasyi, H. F. (2018). Worldview Islam and Secularization. Tsaqafah, 14(2), 253–276.
Zubaida, S. (2005). Law and Power in the Islamic World. Third World Quarterly, 26(3), 401–415.
Abdullah, M. A. (2017). Islamic Studies in Higher Education. Al-Jami‘ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 391–426.
Hasyim, S. (2015). Islamic Reformism and Social Change. Journal of Indonesian Islam, 9(1), 1–28.
Kersten, C. (2011). Contemporary Islamic thought. Journal of Islamic Studies, 22(3), 367–395.
Moosa, E. (2015). What is a Madrasa? Journal of Islamic Studies, 26(3), 1–22.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Orbis Islamica

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

